Monday, December 1, 2008

Sure, I'm not Nostradamus, but.... and it will take a miracle tomorrow to knock off looney Saxby Chambliss

I had an interesting discussion last night with an older friend. He literally has a genius IQ and works as an economics professor. Naturally, we began discussing the state of our economy and what lies ahead. As a fellow staunch Democrat, he lauded Obama for selecting a very intelligent and capable economic team. This just scratched the surface for a much broader perspective.

At one point, I asked him if he believed we're heading one day to a one world- type governing body. He didn't hesitate with his response. Yes, technology and trade are the two main ingredients, he replied and added it won't happen during our lifetimes. I disagreed with him that an individual will be the deciding factor. I believe it will comprise of dignitaries from all nations.

Yes, this sounds ludicrous, but our world is becoming more and more interdependent. Religion is one means for controlling the masses, while economic power is another. Since the beginning of time, civilizations have died over these two instituions. I have an optimistic view about this crazy hypothetical.

Tensions will continue to worsen at some point. Zealots and extreme nationalists will wage more terrorist attacks. However, military might will eventually concede to goods and services. We already see how this has played a role in the European Union. It's just a matter of time before the U.S., Asia, and others follow suit.

I can understand why those of you reading this might say this is impractical. After all, there are so many rogue nations out there who continually oppress their people and refuse to cooperate with the global community. True. This will be a slow process. Ultimately, these countries will join in as well. There still will be sovereignty among all countries, but everyone will be involved in the trading process. Any nation who poses an imminent threat to its people or neighboring state will be isolated. This already exists now with economic sanctions. Eventually, the trading value will outweigh any insecurities to heighten one's military industrial complex.

My promise if Martin pulls off the upset

Wednesday will be a great day for all the Con-Servatives and talking heads. The rednecks and ill-informed will vote to keep the extremist incumbent Republican Saxby Chambliss in office. I will be surprised if there is more than a 35 to 40 percent turnout among eligible voters. Here's why.

Georgia is already a red state, and unfortunately, the majority views Barack Obama as a liberal extremist. They fear he will raise their taxes which has already happened under Bush. They also fear Obama will take away their guns, grant more reproductive rights and choices for women, and be soft on criminals. They value a nepotistic, highly controlled police state and don't know better. Sorry. It's just the sad reality here. So, I won't be surprised to hear, "You see, we showed the Democrats we won't stand for absolute control in government where they can pass all their radical bills. You said no to big government and union control. This was a mandate for free market capitalism and true Conservative values."

If Martin wins and I pray he does, I promise all of you a cool pic on here. I had to take the previous family pic down. This one will have me performing an Irish jig, holding up a "Go Liberals" sign directly in front of my county's Republican headquarters. It will be unlikely, but it would be nice.

2 comments:

Thomas said...

One of my favorite books (Conversations With God Book II) talks about how practical it would be to have a one-world government. Here's an excerpt from it:

Your world, and the condition it is in, is a reflection of the total, combined consciousness of everyone living there.
As you can see by looking around you, much work is left to be done. Unless of course, you are satisfied with your world as it is.
Surprisingly, most people are. That is why the world does not change.
Most people are satisfied with a world in which differences, not similarities, are honored, and disagreements are settled by conflict and war.
Most people are satisfied with a world in which survival is for the fittest, "might is right," competition is required, and winning is called the highest good.
If such a system happens also to produce "losers"—so be it—so long as you are not among them.
Most people are satisfied, even though such a model produces people who are often killed when they are judged "wrong," starved and rendered homeless when they are "losers," oppressed and exploited when they are not "strong."
Most people define "wrong" as that which is different from them. Religious differences, in particular, are not tolerated, nor are many social, economic, or cultural differences.
Exploitation of the underclass is justified by the self-congratulatory pronouncements from the upper class of how much better off their victims are now than they were before these exploitations. By this measure the upper class can ignore the issue of how all people ought to be treated if one were being truly fair, rather than merely making a horrible situation a tiny bit better-and profiting obscenely in the bargain.

This fear of anything leading to unification and your planet's glorification of All That Separates produce division, disharmony, discord—yet you do not seem to have the ability even to learn from your own experience, and so you continue your behaviors, with the same results.
The inability to experience the suffering of another as one's own is what allows such suffering to continue.
Separation breeds indifference, false superiority. Unity produces compassion, genuine equality.
The events which occur on your planet—which have occurred regularly for 3,000 years—are, as I've said, a reflection of the Collective Consciousness of "your group" the whole group on your planet.
That level of consciousness could best be described as primitive.

Unknown said...

Thomas,

I've got to read both books. There are some very powerful, insightful views that are reflective of our collective conciousness and fallacies. Thanks again for the excerpts, and I look forward to reading these two books.